Showing posts with label van. Show all posts
Showing posts with label van. Show all posts

Friday, October 1, 2021

Kirkus REview on Ng.Uyen Nicole Duong's Postcards from Nam

 https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/uyen-nicole-duong/postcards-from-nam/

POSTCARDS FROM NAM

A lawyer in the United States who escaped Communist Vietnam as a child receives mysterious postcards from a childhood friend that reopens old emotional wounds.

Mimi works in Washington, D.C., as a lawyer. Lost in the hazy blur of her hectic career, she rarely pauses to consider her traumatic childhood. Born and raised in Vietnam, she fled the country with her family in 1975 when Saigon fell to the Communists. Her grandmother refused to join them, however, afraid that her frailty would prevent their escape. Years later, now a successful professional living a thoroughly American life, Mimi begins to receive postcards from someone named Nam—she can’t recall anyone of that name, but he seems to know her well, referring to her as Mi Chau, the Vietnamese name no one she knows now uses. Her mother remembers him, though, as a sweet boy who lived across the alley in Saigon, a talented artist who brought Mimi treats, told her ghost stories, and tearfully professed his love for her. Mimi becomes obsessed with finding Nam and learning his fate, a dogged pursuit that brings her into a long-overdue confrontation with her own, formerly silenced demons, a struggle affectingly portrayed by author Duong. “Nam became my project—the symbol for my pursuit of nobility and the return to my roots.” In nimble prose, the author explores the intractability of the protagonist’s past, as resistant to revision as it is to evasion. Mimi is a memorably drafted character, both emotionally fragile and relentless. This is a brief novella—under 100 pages—but densely layered with poignancy and nuance.

A moving, poetically rendered tale of personal pain buried deep in willful self-reinvention.

Monday, December 9, 2019

the ky.net va Duong Nhu Nguyen: van chuong nu quyen etc.

Bài ngḥi luận dưới đây, nguyên tác tiếng Anh, đăng ở Thế Kỷ Net giải thích rất rõ, qua hình thức nghị luận khoa bảng, sự khác biệt giưã văn khiêu dâm lá cải, cái thùng rác, và văn chương nữ quyền hay văn học.  Tôi xin tóm tắt:  Văn khiêu dâm tục tĩu không phải là văn học và không có chỗ đứng trong văn học.  Văn chương trữ tì̀nh literary erotica qua trường hợp cuà nhà văn Anais Nin được thế giới Tây phương ghi nhận chỗ đứng trong văn học vì bà viết rất đẹp, không hề tục tĩu, nhưng bà không được chỗ đứng lớn trong văn học nhân bản như Pearl S. Buck.  Lợi dụng tình dục để viết văn rẻ tiền kích thích độc giả để câu khách không phải là thế đứng cuả nhà văn, nhất là nhà văn  đúng nghĩa mang ưu tư trước nhân sinh.  Anais Nin mở một con đường cho người nữ víết văn đi ngược lại truyền thống vì thế có nhiều độc giả cho bà là cây bút cuả nử quyền, nhưng bà ṛach nát ranh giới cuả  căn bàn gia đình tôn giáo và đạo đức bản thân trong sự phát triền xã hội. Văn chương nữ quyền đã có mặt trước 1975 ở̃ Nam Việt Nam đặt lại v/d thân xác, đời sống, và khát vọng hôn nhân, tình yêu cũng như vai tr̀o xã hội cuả người nữ trong kinh nghiệm nhân sinh, có sự xung đột trong xã hội truyền thống vì ảnh hưởng tâm lý con người gây ra bởi chiến tranh, cho dù nhà văn nữ không nói ̣đến chiến tranh đi nưã. Đó là văn học, không phải văn khiêu dâm. Hiện nay ở VN có hiện tượng dùng đời sống pḥu nữ nhất là ở những nơi chốn lầm than để nói lên những biểu tượmg trăn trở về sự sống còn cuà văn hóa và dân tộc.  Đó cũng là văn học, không phải văn khiêu dâm.

Bài nghị luận này đươc dịch bởi người trong nước và tôi có xem lại cho đúng ý, nhưng không sưả văn phong, để nguyên tính cách hành văn cuả người VN bây giờ, trên tám mươi triệu...Dĩ nhiên không phải là văn phong cuả tôi khi tôi viết thẳng bằng tiếng Việt, trử những đoạn ngắn tôi thêm vào bằng tiếng Việt khi nói đến tác phẩm Bướm Khuya cuả Tuý Hồng... 

 https://www.diendantheky.net/2019/12/wendy-nicole-nn-duong-sang-tac-van.html#more

https://www.diendantheky.net/2019/12/wendy-nicole-nn-duong-sang-tac-van.html#more


Friday, October 25, 2019

ONE LOOK AT AMERICA: ask not....


"Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You"


John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961

We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom — symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning — signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.


The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.


We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans — born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage — and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.


Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.


This much we pledge — and more.


To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do — for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.


To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom — and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.


To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.


To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge — to convert our good words into good deeds — in a new alliance for progress — to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbours know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.


To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support — to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective — to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak — and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.


Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.


We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.


But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course — both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.


So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.


Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belabouring those problems which divide us.


Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms — and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.


Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.


Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth the command of Isaiah — to "undo the heavy burdens -. and to let the oppressed go free."


And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavour, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved.


All this will not be finished in the first 100 days. Nor will it be finished in the first 1,000 days, nor in the life of this Administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.


In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than in mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.


Now the trumpet summons us again — not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are — but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation" — a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.


Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?


In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility — I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavour will light our country and all who serve it — and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.


And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.


My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.


Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.

Monday, July 29, 2019

Văn chương cuả cô Từ Nguyên ̣(Trần Quý Cáp, Đồng Khánh, Trưng Vương)...


Đạo đức cuả người mẹ Việt Nam

Trích ti điếu văn khóc M Chng ca Bà Nguyn Th T Nguyên, cu giáo sư Vit Văn trường Trần Quý Cáp Hội An và Đng Khánh Huế (bây gi là trường Hai Bà Trưng, Huế, Vit Nam).
Con dâu trưởng, khóc Cụ Bà Khuất T.Kh. (mệnh chung ở California, 1998):

“M ơi, lưu lc x người có bát cơm đy nuôi thân là nh đc m.

Đàn cháu thành người hu dng nơi x người, là nh lc bà…

Li m dy:  Giúp người ta, cho người ta, ko phi ti! Vâng, nếu không giúp người,, tc là có ti vi tri.

Li m nói v vic trông nom đàn cháu:  Có hoa mng hoa, có n mng n.”  Vâng, nuôi dy và lo cho con cháu bt k thân mình, đó là nhim v ca m già như k làm vườn: mng hoa, mng n ca tri đt ban cho